Most people paste their resume into ChatGPT and hope for the best. Your resume is not the problem. Your prompt is. Claude can run four back-to-back skills on your resume, and each one hands off to the next so it gets stronger at every step.
The instinct is understandable: drop your resume in, ask for feedback, get a list of suggestions. The problem is that a single generic prompt gives you generic feedback. It does not simulate an Applicant Tracking System. It does not benchmark you against what real job posts are asking for. It does not rewrite your bullets to a proven formula. And it definitely does not quiz you on the interview questions a hiring manager is likely to pull from your specific experience.
Claude, used with the right structured prompts, can do all four of those things in a single session, in sequence. That sequence is the difference between a resume that feels improved and one that is actually optimised for the full hiring funnel: automated filter, recruiter screen, hiring manager review, and interview.
One resume. Four checkpoints. Each skill builds on the last, so by the time you reach the interview prep stage, the work is already done.
Open a single Claude conversation and paste your resume at the top. Then run each skill in order, keeping everything in the same thread so Claude retains context across all four steps.
Copy these into your Claude session in order. Replace the bracketed sections with your own content.
You are an ATS (Applicant Tracking System) scanner. Audit the resume below as if you are processing it for the following job description. Flag every section that would cause it to be filtered out or ranked poorly. For each issue, tell me: - What the problem is - Why it matters to an ATS - Exactly how to fix it Be specific. Do not give general advice. [PASTE YOUR RESUME] Job description: [PASTE THE JOB DESCRIPTION]
Now act as a senior recruiter who has reviewed 1,000 applications for roles similar to this one. Compare my updated resume against what top candidates in this field typically present. List the keywords, skills, and phrases that are missing or underrepresented. Prioritise by how much they are likely to affect my ranking in an ATS and in a recruiter screen. Use the same resume and job description from above.
Now act as a professional resume writer trained on Google's XYZ formula: "Accomplished [X], as measured by [Y], by doing [Z]." Rewrite every bullet point in my experience section using this formula. Where I have not given you a specific metric, suggest a realistic placeholder I can verify and fill in. Do not pad or exaggerate. Keep each bullet to one or two lines. Output the full rewritten experience section, ready to copy.
Now act as the hiring manager for this role. You have just read my final resume. Ask me the 5 questions you are most likely to ask in a first-round interview, one at a time. After each answer I give you, score it out of 10 and explain what a 10-out-of-10 answer would have included. Start with question 1 now.
Most resume bullets describe a responsibility. The XYZ formula forces a result. Here is what the difference looks like in practice:
| Before | Managed social media accounts for the company and grew the audience. |
| After (XYZ) | Grew Instagram following by 340% in 6 months by launching a weekly short-form video series targeting industry decision-makers. |
| Before | Worked with the sales team to improve conversion rates. |
| After (XYZ) | Increased sales team conversion rate from 12% to 19% by redesigning the outbound email sequence and introducing a two-touch follow-up cadence. |
The rewritten versions are not longer. They are just more specific in the right direction: what changed, by how much, and what you did to make it happen. That specificity is what gets a bullet read instead of skimmed.
If you would rather have a tailored Claude prompt set for your specific role, industry, and resume, that is something we can put together in a single session.
Follow @itsriz for AI tips every single day.